Hoi4 heavy fighters. Ots gonna take a while, but eventuqlly you start winning.

Hoi4 heavy fighters Because only then you get the 1. Generally air combat in HOI4 devolves into a massive slugging match in a certain airzone. For that reason, heavy fighters are also the ones to escort bombers. Heavy Fighters should be able to do more, like a lot more. I don't play Germany, so I don't know the strategy really, but 2k isn't a ton of planes, in my opinion. Self sealing fuel tanks are also viable if you have excess rubber or can I have been playing Hoi4 Day by day, everyday, But given the current state of ai air builds you really dont need to make an Interceptor Heavy Fighter as they never build Strat Bombers on the current patch. Trying to deploy heavy fighters and the game crashes as soon as i click on them to create an air wing. There were no late-war Allied turboprops. Speed modifies attack: if one plane is (x)% faster than another plane, it takes that as a modifier to attack value, likewise if the opposing plane is (x)% slower it takes that as a negative modifier to attack. If you fight in areas without hungar in every state the range can be useful. That was literally the purpose of heavy fighters, to shoot down bigger aircraft. The ai doesn’t strat bomb too much tho so against the ai heavies are mostly only useful for their range. I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the aerial warfare aspect of this game, both historically and in the game. 5. 75 casualty rate and don't replace any planes, the light fighters will also win straight up. You can find a use for the twin cannon modules on dedicated interceptors but really, for the vast majority of designs, At a base level, in game just quickly glancing at the heavy fighter vs. What counts as a heavy fighter airframe? The others are mostly correct but heavy fighters can be really usefull if you have problems with enemy bombers over your country. Open comment sort options. Heavy fighters with armor plates and self sealing fuel tanks + heavy mgs (maybe with like 2 x Cannons too) are absolutely brutal Reply reply No-Yogurtcloset-4151 • Man I have never actually given heavy fighters a try in my way too many hours of HOI4. They can easily dominate a sky zone out-numbered two to one or more. Top. You could have had 3 times the number of normal fighters at that cost. Because By Blood Alone changed Tactical Bombers and Heavy Fighters into one research tree the USA now has both a 100% and 300%(!) Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. Also if your looking just at the Chinese war, inless china can be lend leased planes during the war (depends on the rule set), you should only build tactical bombers ( around 4-5 factories) after leasing from Germany from the start of the This is pretty much it. 406K subscribers in the hoi4 community. If you are lacking range, just upgrade it in the production tab after you maxed the Heavy fighters are great to accompany long range bombers. You can make like 3-4 small fighters per 1 heavy fighter. I would love feedback/criticism. I don' think they are worth it for tacs though. Strategic bombers are heavily armored, to the point light fighters are not a very good counter. People who use them most of the time do it because of their range. Heavy fighters on the other hand, have waaaay more firepower, so they go through bombers like rice paper while suffering fewer losses. r/hoi4. Today, we discuss some rules of thumb for heavy fighters. Some people hate on him cuz of how he spreads misinformation and bad advice to players while others don't care about his faults and watch him because he is entertaining to watch for a lot of It is mostly a MP thing IMO. #5. Heavy Fighters are better against TACs and STRATs than fighters, but are weaker against fighters. You don't even need 10% spotting to activate all of your heavy fighters. Speed and agility > everything else. Regular fighters out trade them cuz of agility stat. They're good at shooting down enemy bombers, and at protecting your bombers from enemy fighters if your bombers go beyond the range of your light The ONLY reason I would not go heavy fighter/TAC is if the nation I am playing has some ludicrous bonuses to fighters/CAS, I start off with some amount of planes researched, or too lazy to change over heavy fighters and just got licenses of fighter/CAS from some puppet on the cheap. A place to share content, Perks of heavy fighters is I doing have to upgrade the design and can get a lot of out early designs without having to lose efficiency when If you are sending 1k heavy fighters into 2k light fighters and getting 60 to 80 trades, or 80 to 120, the light fighters are (soundly) winning, unless AAT changed the chassis and component costs w/o me noticing. In general, fighting in western continental Europe, North America or with a large carrier fleet (carrier variant), normal fighters 695 votes, 68 comments. no heavy fighters were used throughout the entire war, it's just that in HOI4 they are more for longer range but less agile, but IRL they were radar equipped night fighters that would exclusively intercept night attacks to great effect. Edit: Heavy Fighter I has longer range than Fighter I, and Heavy Fighter III outranges Fighter I (by double) but Heavy fighter II and fighter II have perfect range parity. Once I get 150 or so of them, I put a 100-plane air group of them in one of my major home industrial areas on bomber intercept. I combine Fighters with CAS, use Fighters for air Superiority. From the same airports so they go with the bombers to cover them. Otherwise just go all HMGs and make a dedicate heavy fighter using cannons for bomber hunting They were trash before. Past that, you The heavy fighter wants to run as many heavy guns as possible, and as many turrets as possible. Unless I misunderstand the wiki article, heavy fighters are 100% better at securing air superiority. If you're that worried about bombings just spend civilian factory time on building some AA batteries, by the time strategic bombings are a threat you have a ton of those from conquered lands and nothing better to do with them. Which one is more effective in general? I mean in the past heavy/strategic bombers never seemed to do much for me, even with air support and ample targets, however I realize that the medium bomber allows for close air support, naval strikes, port strikes, and strategic bombing, What are some good templates for fighters? my main fighter template. This means you get substantially more air superiority per production cost by using I have actually been using heavy fighters as my cas lately. Needed many more hits to score a kill on a beefy bomber which risks getting shot down yourself, but it was much easier A good medium fighter can get around a 5:1 kill advantage over a good light fighter for around 3. Heavy fighters are literally so good it’s unreal. 52 Badges. Fighters are short range and defense. 0 unless otherwise noted. If your front-line airfields are all maxed out, or if you're Use Heavy fighters to support your Strategic bombers, especially if you’re trying to nuke someone. Now they're slightly more useful simply cuz good fighters don't have as much Testing out the heavy fighter that every claims is the new Meta but isn't really that good. MattZed Major. The meta is fighter because of agility. Also add AA to your divisions in the isle. So, splitting between the two is more cost effective. Heavy fighters are obviously better at going after bombers. Mar 21, 2019 564 518. Carrier frames have like a 3 additional industry cost to account for the landing cables and heavier landing gear Heavy fighters are good for killing strategic and tactical bombers, but they are bad against interceptor fighters. ; About Hearts of Iron 4 Wiki; Mobile view Heavy Fighters with range MIO on the USA are the second strongest fighters in the game. Reply reply Redesiging HOI4 flags, FRANCE 9. In big air zones like Russia, heavy fighters are especially useful as Heavy fighters are worth it if you have a lot of bombers to shoot down or are trying to cover very large theaters like those in Africa or Asia. Good assessment, one more note that heavy fighters require double the manpower, so another strike against them. The full tree gives the same mission efficiency bonus to both missions. I usually just keep one factory open on a heavy fighter line, lowest priority so it doesn't starve anything else for resources. g. 258 votes, 55 comments. 25, normal fighters are substantially cheaper while having a multiplier of 1. Just putting my thoughts out here to see what the community thinks. If they get say 80% we're that's suddenly almost a half of their fighters not fighting you. HOI4 is not World War 2, it’s just a game. There were some posts suggesting heavy 1 and 2 might actually be better than the counterparts. Report. A Members Online • EnglishC0k. 5 the production cost. the Hawker Sea Fury). Couple bomb locks, couple mgs and a bunch of turrets/armor/ fuel along with regular fighters and it helps chew through large amounts of enemy fighters while still dealing Cas damage. Normal fighters work better in small, adjenct airzones against other fighters, heavy fighters, and CAS. Heavy fighters have the advantage when the circumstances aren't optimal. The meta fighter is to use 4 heavy machine gun to get decent air attack without sacrifice agility. A good design is 1 dual cannon and 2 quad HMGs as this can fight enemy fighters and can do ‘some’ damage to bombers. Just slap a few turrets on your bombers and as long as you got fighters up with them they should be fine. -And- they cost half as much oil. If there's limited airbases then the numerical superiority can't be used and the individually better heavy fighters have the advantgage. I play Italy mainly, and I'm pumping out around 2k fighters as well, but with another 2k nav bombers on top of that, plus hundreds of The only time you build carrier fighters is if you are Japan and you take the war cabinet decision for focus on naval aircraft over army aircraft which reduces the cost for carrier plans to be less than equivalent land only aircraft. You might be thinking of turbosupercharged prop planes (e. New. Really enjoyed it as Heavy fighters are just good for long range escorts for strategic bombing. Heavy fighters don't actually get "good" at escort until the 1944 Heavy fighters loose because Light Fighters have superior speed and agility. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. Heavy Fighters IRL were The reason people use heavy fighters is because of range. Light machine guns were the opposite. " But I can't find that airframe anywhere: it's just small, medium, or large. And since this is AFAIK hardcoded, I can't even fix this in a mod Plz help Paradox Build heavy fighters mostly. They also will help regular fighters win when out numbered when they make up about 30% of your total fighters. naval bombers as those are usually what you lose and it's usually to ship AA but high air defence 'protects' against fighters and AA A place to submit spicy meme related to the greatest grand strategy game "HOI4" For Bozo's bombers over MY turf, up gunned Heavy fighters set on Intercept can do the trick . Against those Heavy Fighters work better in areas such as Africa and the Pacific War where the regions are typically larger and their range is required to gain mission efficiency. Taking down strategic bombers. Aug 6, 2017 @ 11:39am Originally posted by Colonel Wilson: Originally posted by soontir fel: I thought it was this not escort In real life during WW2 There are also two types of Fighters in HOI4: Light and Heavy Fighters, and they are both very useful in their own right. -And- because they don't start researched, you can get a 20% reliability bonus from the aircraft So, I'm relatively new to HoI4 and trying to figure out air combat. Use the heavy fighters in contested space to efficiently crush the enemy fighters then use light fighters to maintain. Best. I actually made custom ideas and tested which stats work the best and high speed and attack are the absolute best performers. Light fighters can thin the herd on air superiority, the Heavy's do most of the killing . If you want to win air superiority in high contested areas, use interceptor. I only bother with them if I'm USA, Japan, Britain, or Italy. Though depending on the techs and builds heavy fighters can work decently in air superiority. Quite expensive though. 25 Air Supremacy modifier too and only then the game will categorize it as Heavy The range and the higher attack values are the main draws of heavy fighters. #hoi4 #hoi4_gameplay Join this channel to get acc Heavy fighters are useless for everyone really, I don't even research them in most cases, research and production is better spent elsewhere. e light fighters) are actually kinda rubbish at shooting down bombers: You'll lose fighters at a close to 1-1 ratio with bombers. Frankwater0522 • You want as many 4X heavy MGs as possible and as many armour plates as you engine will allow. One stat that Heavy fighters have over regular fighters is that their Air superiority value is 2 If you want the Heavy Fighter from before the update you would need to go for the medium airframe. I tried using Heavy fighters with max HMG & air defense & traded a lot better, even though I was horrendously outnumbered then. Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. 1000/80 is 12. So, for HOI4, use Heavy Fighters to defend airspace against Bombers, and use normal ones to escort them. They are not as good for air superiority but yes you should have a mix. Build heavy fighters only if you are been strategic bombed a lot. I found however that my heavy fighters were being decimated by the enemy's light fighters either on escort, air superiority, or both. This is why we will show you both a Light and Heavy While heavy fighters have a higher multiplier for air superiority of 1. Two engines as many turrets as possible and then the rest guns. It's sad however that light fighter aces cannot fly heavy fighters and generally, no aces seem to be able to spawn on a heavy fighter wing. I'm so confused. Agility is not meta right now, you dont need to worry about agility. Heavy fighters have much more firepower. Light fighters win even at very low mission efficiency (like 30%). The AI is not great at using large scale strategic bombing against you, but in MP it can be useful to have a few Heavy Fighters (which have more attack and work better against TAC and STRAT) in interception. The majority believes regular fighter is better especially if you rush fighter 2 and 3 with all the Agi buffs might actually be better than Heavy Fighter. Most of the time Lighter Fighters are the superior choice, if you have near-unstoppable super economy I would recommend you build both, but if you can't go light. Agility is the king of all stats for fighters, that’s why people 1 heavy fighter is better than 1 fighter so if you have limited station space it's better. Heavy Fighters are good but, again if range is not an important factor for you, I'd prefer using fighters r/hoi4. Archived post. I have been playing Hoi4 Day by day, everyday, since May 7th, 2020, ask me anything I think recent changes have made the Air Defense stat the more important figure to go for. Q&A. The argument for IC cost is defeated when you can apply tac bomber production cost reduction from focus and continuous focus aircraft production essentially He's a controversial figure in hoi4 community. 398K subscribers in the hoi4 community. They are expensive though. They cost a lot more IC, weigh a lot more, and impose a serious agility penalty compared to the 4x Heavy MG module. Heavy fighters are not a bad choice for japan, i just feel that light fighters preform better and you need to research them anyways for carrier fighter 2s. That's a very niche application though. Max heavy machine guns. before AAT i used medium for heavy fighters and heavy cas, worked pretty good for me but then again i Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. Fighters are way more powerful than Heavy Fighters purely because they are less cumbersome than the latter. 407K subscribers in the hoi4 community. , the P-38 & P-47, and the American heavy bombers) or maybe the last generation of prop fighters, which are often called "superprops" (stuff that went into production just as the war ended, but never really saw combat; e. This allows them to invest in brute force instead. I've seen a lot of dumb crashes over the years but this one takes the cake. Pausing the game makes no difference, my pc has a good cpu and the rest of the game works fine. They can also be used for interception missions to defend against enemy bombers 654 votes, 56 comments. tv/71Cloak Heavy fighters are too expensive in engine to exploit their advantages in equipment slots and air defenses To summarize briefly: Under the preconditions OF no additional use of Heavy fighters have almost double the firepower compared to fighters and against bombers, which themselves have usually more air defence then fighters have air attack and sometimes more air attack than fighters have defence, so heavy fighters are better at making a dent in strat bombers. This page was last edited on 10 January 2017, at 19:12. You can manually assign carrier fighters to intercept in a zone like you would with land based aircraft. So, no. That said, carrier fighters aren't amazing. The exact template is 4 4x hmg and 1 4x lmg with double engine 3(jet engines if an MP) and only self sealing. the US and Japan might also make better use of twin engine fighters than other nations, to try and squeeze extra range out of their light airframes via extra fuel tanks, without the sluggishness of heavy fighters Regular fighters aren't terribly good at this: You'll probably manage a 1:1 trade, which while still decent in terms of IC, is wasteful in regards to manpower and efficiency in general. No, assuming the heavy fighters are on Operational Integrity, there is not any significant difference between intercept and air superiority. ; About Hearts of Iron 4 Wiki; Mobile view I build heavy fighters with max agility first because they already have more attack and range. Ots gonna take a while, but eventuqlly you start winning. If the airzone is far away normal fighters will lose efficiency due to range (or be entirely unable to reach it in the first place). Heavy fighters are basically for when you really want the extra range, like in the pacific or maybe the Russian theater and they are the go to tac and strat bomber killers. which are better fighters or heavy fighters in hearts of iron iv? we test heavy fighters and fighters in hoi4 to try and figure out which is all around bette Go to hoi4 r/hoi4 • by Heavy fighters are almost twice as cost efficient at killing tactical and strategic bombers. In a fair 1 vs 1 situation, a normal fighter build wins from heavy fighters. You do have to use cannons if you want to intercept Strat I expect most nations don't want to take the extra cost on for fighters, but CAS might appreciate the extra payment if they can be promised Green Air. Twitch. I’ve got to They are okay but mostly for heavy fighters, for normal fighters 4HMGs are better since they are cheaper and having a lot of planes is better for air detection. Triple heavy mg ands both armor plates and self sealing fuel tanks. Attack is important because a high attack cleaves through a lot of planes easily. I really just use heavy fighters to cover broad areas of the ocean or to support land combat in poorly-supplied areas. When head to head fighting reg fighters win because the agility they have is better than the heavy fighters. A place to share content, O to be clear I LOVE the lighting! heavy fighters with range extension are amazing! Just bummed that they didn't do much quality control Simply going through some period of 1939 with less then perfectly efficient fighters may net you more fighters in 1940, even if there is a brief loss in 39. 380K subscribers in the hoi4 community. They are going to trade favourably. For the USA specifically, go nuts. Fighter vs Heavy Fighter. The heavy fighters far outclass the light fighters, but I'm not sure if that is going to be that helpful. In another podcast he does a practice run of 500 fighter 1s vs 500 heavy fighters over Northern France 57 votes, 11 comments. A So I just got "By Blood Alone" and apparently adding Rudolph Hess now gives you cheaper "Heavy Fighter Airframes. They can be useful, but only when used correctly. What's more cost effective, fighters or heavy fighters? This depends mainly on what you are doing. I did a quick math and seems that Heavy Fighters and Tac Bombers are just plain worse than regular Fighters and CAS respectively in every respect except their range. Don't use heavy fighters to grind down enemy fighters. ADMIN MOD Are heavy fighters worth it? Question Are heavy fighter really worth it? Share Sort by: Best. Add a Comment. Heavy fighters work better in larger airzones, far away airzones, and against tactical and strategic bombers. First of all let's talk about the differences, and the most notable one is operational range. 100 light fighters will shoot down 21 heavy fighters. Also, focus all air production on fighters, forget cas, ground them all, since they are useless for the moment HoI4: A way to improve AI in the field Post-War Demobilization. I don’t know about black ice but generally I have a thousand fighters per army plus some more. . German nation-unique heavy fighters, jet interceptors, dive bombers & jet attackers for ULTRA Historical Mod (WIP) This thread is archived New comments cannot You can also try Sky Tank style Heavy Fighters . Reply. Simply put, light fighter > heavy fighter > strategic bomber > light fighter. The increased range can be very helpful in a lot of situations; covering distant zones with full / too far away I think the common consensus is that heavy fighters are strong, but per ic, they will start to lose vs fighters. light fighter stats I realized the difference. If enemy fighters can't cover the entire air zone than heavy fighters become competetive against them. Air-superiority fighters(i. In general though, my experience in HOI4 is that adopting strategies that minimize the number of changes you make to your production lines usually wins in the long run. If you put heavy fighters on interception missions they will shred those bombers. They can’t keep up with the agility of light fighters, but they can stack enough armor to get really high air defense to offset the lower air attack of light fighters, while the heavy’s higher air attack shreds light fighters’ lower air defense. Maxing attack up to weight limit is currently meta, playing against both Clearly I’m using full upgraded fighters but I’m more looking at my medium and heavy bombers. soontir fel. Tests bear this out. Old. Your normal fighter dont completly cover the air zone, so they get a penalty to And that's if they even manage to get 100% spotting. You air-superiority in a region is determined by stats * the percentage of the region your plans have range in. R5: I was looking the differences between regular and heavy fighters, and the latters seems, kinda useless. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Paradox Development Studio. Heavy fighters have extra range and extra damage (at the cost of agility), so you'd use them when one or both of those stats are relevant. Carrier fighters and land fighters are the same. These will absolutely crush meta fighters This page was last edited on 10 January 2017, at 19:12. Really you want to fill up the carriers with as many bombers as possible, because carrier-based bombers are much better than land based bombers. Heavy fighters are very bad for air supperiority, since they are inferior to normal fighters. Normal fighters are better against CAS, naval bombers, fighters and heavy fighters, even when you factor in the higher oil cost for 1940/1944 versions. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. Heavy Fighters work well with and against bombers. Heavy fighters are mostly for long range high attack capable of chasing down long range bombers. Controversial. If you continue that 0. Jul 2, 2019; Add bookmark Heavy fighters are only really useful for bomber interception and patrolling huge air zones like the ones in Northeast and Central Asia, Africa, and over the oceans. Maxed out fighters had range, agility, and enough stats to kill any bombers or fighters. While heavy fighters die faster they also kill faster so if you have production to spend or the enemy has was more cas then fighters heavy fighters can be used. The only good thing about heavy fighters is their range, which you didnt spec into. Members Online. I sick the heavy fighters on the bombers (they do higher attack damage and still have more agility(?) than bombers) and the regular fighters (with max engines) do air superiority to shred the enemy fighters. The Air-to-air radar buff is only remotely worth it on dedicated bomber-interceptor heavy fighters where module slots are plentiful, sacrificing one for something so situational 710 votes, 55 comments. Heavy fighters are only really useful for bomber interception and patrolling huge air zones like the ones in Northeast and Central Asia, Africa, and over the oceans. When that happens your priority should be building as many maxed airfields and radars nearby and filling the airfields with fighters. Armor. Using the previous single engine max HMG meta currently I trade 2 kills for 1 of mine shot down. Then when combining tactical or strategic with heavy. The only time I Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. 100 heavy fighters will shoot down 40 light fighters. ixwa uxyhsy zlz hbpyk utuiuy lwwlu qqxws zabqc ych qyokq rfwhsgox dbbteng ithx eakayi cmlcpa